October 14
Thinking about today's class on Manures and the Nitrogen Cycle, i made the connection to an interesting paper I read a few year ago by Eagle et al. Here's an extract of theta hundred and so paper.
N2O mitigation potential of agricultural land management through irrigation (Eagle et al. 2008)
Thinking about today's class on Manures and the Nitrogen Cycle, i made the connection to an interesting paper I read a few year ago by Eagle et al. Here's an extract of theta hundred and so paper.
N2O mitigation potential of agricultural land management through irrigation (Eagle et al. 2008)
The use of irrigation in agricultural fields is known to
increases the potential of N2O emissions by means of reducing
aeration in the soil and increasing microbial activity. Studies comparing irrigated
versus non-irrigated fields show an increased N2O flux of 0.05 t CO2e
ha-1 yr-1 on irrigated versus non-irrigated turf grass (Bremer 2006), and an
average difference of approximately 0.7 t CO2 e ha-1 yr-1
between 28 dry land and 13 irrigated land experiments (Liebig et al.
2005).
There is a significant number of “best management irrigation
practices” available to mitigate N2O emissions in agricultural
fields. Studies show that by reducing the total amount of water applied and
optimizing water distribution to root zones, irrigation efficiency gains can
provide water savings as well as GHG benefits. Total N2O emissions
after a reduction in irrigation intensity have been measured to decrease by
between 0.1 t CO2e ha-1 yr-1 and 0.9 t CO2 e ha-1 yr-1 (Rochette et al. 2008, Scheer et al. 2008, both studies
taken from in Eagle et al. 2012).
Scheer et al. (2008) determined that
reducing irrigation intensity (irrigating cotton when soil moisture was at 65%
instead of 75% of field capacity) reduced N2 O emissions by almost 50% (0.94 t
CO2 e ha-1 yr-1), and similar effects were observed on winter wheat fi elds,
although the total impact was lower because of lower baseline emissions (Eagle et al. 2012).
Studies by Kallenbach et
al. (2010) and Amos et al. (2005) also documented significantly lower N2O
fluxes with drip and buried tape (versus surface) irrigation, although annual
mitigation effects could not be determined because of relatively short-term flux
measurements (Eagle et al. 2012).
Taken from:
Eagle, A., L. Olander, L.R. Henry, K. Haugen-Kozyra, N. Millar, and G.P. Robertson. 2012. Greenhouse Gas
Mitigation Potential of Agricultural Land Management in the United States: A Synthesis of the Literature. Report NI
R 10-04, Third Edition. Durham, NC: Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions, Duke University
No comments:
Post a Comment